<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Little Known Mini Taj Mahal</title>
	<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal</link>
	<description>You can waste your life drawing lines. Or you can live your life crossing them.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sarina</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-136</link>
		<author>Sarina</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-136</guid>
					<description>This is a cool blog!

Thanks for letting us know about the "other" Taj Mahal, this is funny. It seems like the original Taj Mahal but on a serious diet! :) and the Trump's Taj Mahal, it looks nothing like the original. It is more like its owner; pompous and gaudy. Mr Trump, "you are rejected!"

Sarina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a cool blog!</p>
<p>Thanks for letting us know about the &#8220;other&#8221; Taj Mahal, this is funny. It seems like the original Taj Mahal but on a serious diet! <img src='http://www.arhama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> and the Trump&#8217;s Taj Mahal, it looks nothing like the original. It is more like its owner; pompous and gaudy. Mr Trump, &#8220;you are rejected!&#8221;</p>
<p>Sarina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Swain</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-137</link>
		<author>Martin Swain</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-137</guid>
					<description>I like the post but I think that &lt;b&gt;Taj Mahal is a big hype!&lt;/b&gt; I have seen grander and more marvelous pieces of architecture in Europe and America than Taj Mahal. Statue of Liberty is more imposing and its history is preserved well and respected all over the world.

I also believe that the new "Seven Wonders" poll was a scam. I bet with over a billion of Indians voting for it; it will make any list of any wonders!

Taj Mahal has developed huge cracks and its dome is falling and the marble on the outside is turning yellow and also developing many "cavities" that looks ugly.

It seems Indians only care to vote for it but not take care of it. Go fix it you lazy bums before start voting for it. I saw all the ads running around urging and begging people to vote and people voted many times just to make it to top seven. Even Great Wall of China does not deserve to be on the list. The communist party would have shot down all Internet subscribers in China if it were not to make the list!

MS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the post but I think that <b>Taj Mahal is a big hype!</b> I have seen grander and more marvelous pieces of architecture in Europe and America than Taj Mahal. Statue of Liberty is more imposing and its history is preserved well and respected all over the world.</p>
<p>I also believe that the new &#8220;Seven Wonders&#8221; poll was a scam. I bet with over a billion of Indians voting for it; it will make any list of any wonders!</p>
<p>Taj Mahal has developed huge cracks and its dome is falling and the marble on the outside is turning yellow and also developing many &#8220;cavities&#8221; that looks ugly.</p>
<p>It seems Indians only care to vote for it but not take care of it. Go fix it you lazy bums before start voting for it. I saw all the ads running around urging and begging people to vote and people voted many times just to make it to top seven. Even Great Wall of China does not deserve to be on the list. The communist party would have shot down all Internet subscribers in China if it were not to make the list!</p>
<p>MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaushal</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-153</link>
		<author>kaushal</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 00:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-153</guid>
					<description>The Taj Mahal is really a piece of architecture
u can't compare it with things like statue of liberty &#38; all other stupid things in US.
ur comments are seriously lacking any truth &#38; filled with lack of knowledge &#38; understanding.
it's time for people like u in US to recognize INDIA and INDIAN objects as wonders of the world.
get going now
ok
A PROUD INDIAN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Taj Mahal is really a piece of architecture<br />
u can&#8217;t compare it with things like statue of liberty &amp; all other stupid things in US.<br />
ur comments are seriously lacking any truth &amp; filled with lack of knowledge &amp; understanding.<br />
it&#8217;s time for people like u in US to recognize INDIA and INDIAN objects as wonders of the world.<br />
get going now<br />
ok<br />
A PROUD INDIAN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirti</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-155</link>
		<author>kirti</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 06:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-155</guid>
					<description>i too dont agree with u mr swain once again go and look at that architechture minutely its a tribute to the people who made it which stands tall in the history and it itself is the answere to ur queries and no one else needs to tell u. so sir learn to appreciate than to criticize this grt monument</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i too dont agree with u mr swain once again go and look at that architechture minutely its a tribute to the people who made it which stands tall in the history and it itself is the answere to ur queries and no one else needs to tell u. so sir learn to appreciate than to criticize this grt monument</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sajid</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-157</link>
		<author>Sajid</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-157</guid>
					<description>A replica big or small can never catch the essence of an "original" . Of the replica's of Taj Mahal you can see one at Dubai too.

http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/jan/31dubai.htm

It can also be a possibility that Aurangzeb who had this done for his mother was not planning to make it a replica, but the Mogul architecture which is similar in most cases, coincidentally created something looking similar to Taj Mahal and with people who are ever ready to draw parallels, coined the name. So in my opinion it is more of a coincidental replica that an attempted replica like that in Dubai, Taiwan, US or any other place :).

Once again a very interesting and well written blog. Keep writing

S/-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A replica big or small can never catch the essence of an &#8220;original&#8221; . Of the replica&#8217;s of Taj Mahal you can see one at Dubai too.</p>
<p><a href="http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/jan/31dubai.htm" rel="nofollow">http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/jan/31dubai.htm</a></p>
<p>It can also be a possibility that Aurangzeb who had this done for his mother was not planning to make it a replica, but the Mogul architecture which is similar in most cases, coincidentally created something looking similar to Taj Mahal and with people who are ever ready to draw parallels, coined the name. So in my opinion it is more of a coincidental replica that an attempted replica like that in Dubai, Taiwan, US or any other place :).</p>
<p>Once again a very interesting and well written blog. Keep writing</p>
<p>S/-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saima</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-159</link>
		<author>Saima</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-159</guid>
					<description>That New Jersey bit is a news to me! How come you never mentioned it while I was there! :-) 

Saima. ok?!

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That New Jersey bit is a news to me! How come you never mentioned it while I was there! <img src='http://www.arhama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Saima. ok?!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.arhama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tushar</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-161</link>
		<author>Tushar</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-161</guid>
					<description>Hi Martin Swain
The Statue of Liberty was 'Erected' in 1886. While the Tajmahal was built with crafted stones more than 240 years before the erection of statue of Liberty.
Just imagine building a huge structure like this when there were no  architects who could define structural design of such magnitude. Statue of Liberty was erected with the help of pulleys and cranes. In 1632 there was no such facility available. All the stone blocks used in building Tajmahal were really heavy. The site was located away from settlements in those times. Hundreds of workers toiled everyday without any basic amenities. 
The design is completely symmetrical on all sides of the building. Plus the craftsmanship involved is nowhere comparable to present day machine polishing. I could go on writing, but it does make sense in pointing out your foolish comparisions of 17th century fine art with begining of 20th century machine age usual structure erection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Martin Swain<br />
The Statue of Liberty was &#8216;Erected&#8217; in 1886. While the Tajmahal was built with crafted stones more than 240 years before the erection of statue of Liberty.<br />
Just imagine building a huge structure like this when there were no  architects who could define structural design of such magnitude. Statue of Liberty was erected with the help of pulleys and cranes. In 1632 there was no such facility available. All the stone blocks used in building Tajmahal were really heavy. The site was located away from settlements in those times. Hundreds of workers toiled everyday without any basic amenities.<br />
The design is completely symmetrical on all sides of the building. Plus the craftsmanship involved is nowhere comparable to present day machine polishing. I could go on writing, but it does make sense in pointing out your foolish comparisions of 17th century fine art with begining of 20th century machine age usual structure erection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arhama</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-165</link>
		<author>Arhama</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 19:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-165</guid>
					<description>Sarina, thank you for your comment. Serious diet is right, or maybe a liposuction! Which ever it is, it sure looks funny and that is why it deserved a post at my blog. Hope to see you around. Thanks again! 

Sajid, interesting link you gave in your comment. But, it won't surprise me if Dubai creates another Mumbai too. They have enough money for it and enough Indians to fill it up. In any case, I feel they didn't build it in rivalry but as a compliment to the original.
 Also, your theory about "coincidental similarity" could be a possibility. I never thought of it that way. Just went along with what Wikipedia told me. Thank for the comments and information. Keep visiting!

Saima, because I found out about it just a few days ago!! We could have visited it while you guys were still there. Anyway, hope to see you here again soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarina, thank you for your comment. Serious diet is right, or maybe a liposuction! Which ever it is, it sure looks funny and that is why it deserved a post at my blog. Hope to see you around. Thanks again! </p>
<p>Sajid, interesting link you gave in your comment. But, it won&#8217;t surprise me if Dubai creates another Mumbai too. They have enough money for it and enough Indians to fill it up. In any case, I feel they didn&#8217;t build it in rivalry but as a compliment to the original.<br />
 Also, your theory about &#8220;coincidental similarity&#8221; could be a possibility. I never thought of it that way. Just went along with what Wikipedia told me. Thank for the comments and information. Keep visiting!</p>
<p>Saima, because I found out about it just a few days ago!! We could have visited it while you guys were still there. Anyway, hope to see you here again soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An indignant Indian</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-225</link>
		<author>An indignant Indian</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-225</guid>
					<description>Mr. Swain,
I have yet to see an inspiring piece of architecture in America. The Chrysler Building, maybe, but little else. Admittedly, I have only seen New York and DC, but that's where I'd expect the best of architecture to be. 
Europe, admittedly, has plenty of magnificent architecture. As does Asia. 
I'm making no claims to Taj Mahal's superiority over other architectural structures, but I do think it is quite wonderful. Yes, it is in a state of disrepair at present, but that does not take away from its intrinsic merit as a beautiful monument.
Why am I actually wasting my time responding to something posted by a ignorant American though?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Swain,<br />
I have yet to see an inspiring piece of architecture in America. The Chrysler Building, maybe, but little else. Admittedly, I have only seen New York and DC, but that&#8217;s where I&#8217;d expect the best of architecture to be.<br />
Europe, admittedly, has plenty of magnificent architecture. As does Asia.<br />
I&#8217;m making no claims to Taj Mahal&#8217;s superiority over other architectural structures, but I do think it is quite wonderful. Yes, it is in a state of disrepair at present, but that does not take away from its intrinsic merit as a beautiful monument.<br />
Why am I actually wasting my time responding to something posted by a ignorant American though?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adium</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-226</link>
		<author>Adium</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-226</guid>
					<description>Come on, the Taj Mahal is FANTASTIC!!!!! Did you know he planned a black one exactly like it for himself across the river? Well, it's a "rumour" anyway... :) 
AND in Delhi there is also a "Mini Taj Mahal", in Nizamuddin; Humayuns Tomb. Actually build well before the Taj Mahal! (not in marble, though) and it's really beautiful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, the Taj Mahal is FANTASTIC!!!!! Did you know he planned a black one exactly like it for himself across the river? Well, it&#8217;s a &#8220;rumour&#8221; anyway&#8230; <img src='http://www.arhama.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
AND in Delhi there is also a &#8220;Mini Taj Mahal&#8221;, in Nizamuddin; Humayuns Tomb. Actually build well before the Taj Mahal! (not in marble, though) and it&#8217;s really beautiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riddhi</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-270</link>
		<author>Riddhi</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-270</guid>
					<description>Well said Tushar !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Tushar !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shradha</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-657</link>
		<author>Shradha</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-657</guid>
					<description>The blog is awesome.There is only one Taj Mahal and its in India but its replica is being made in Bangladesh and the Indian High Commission in Dhaka is quite upset because of this reason.
Since imagination is the sincerest form flattery so we should be proud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog is awesome.There is only one Taj Mahal and its in India but its replica is being made in Bangladesh and the Indian High Commission in Dhaka is quite upset because of this reason.<br />
Since imagination is the sincerest form flattery so we should be proud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geetika Thakur</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-682</link>
		<author>Geetika Thakur</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-682</guid>
					<description>and i must say...
WELL SAID TUSHAR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and i must say&#8230;<br />
WELL SAID TUSHAR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ally loo</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-4014</link>
		<author>ally loo</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-4014</guid>
					<description>the one in bangladesh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the one in bangladesh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ally loo</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-4015</link>
		<author>ally loo</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-4015</guid>
					<description>isnt it imitation is the sincerest for m of flattery SHRADHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isnt it imitation is the sincerest for m of flattery SHRADHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thailand Shop</title>
		<link>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-4702</link>
		<author>Thailand Shop</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 04:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.arhama.com/culture/the-little-known-mini-taj-mahal#comment-4702</guid>
					<description>Just what I was looking for! I was researching articles for our blog when I came across your post (on Mini Taj Mahal, Replica of Mini Taj Mahal &#124; Arhama) which I found on Yahoo. We would love you to write for us, if curious. I've bookmarked this post for future reference. Nice comments here as well - Cheers from Thailand Shop</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what I was looking for! I was researching articles for our blog when I came across your post (on Mini Taj Mahal, Replica of Mini Taj Mahal | Arhama) which I found on Yahoo. We would love you to write for us, if curious. I&#8217;ve bookmarked this post for future reference. Nice comments here as well - Cheers from Thailand Shop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
